Climatic Risk Atlas of European Butterflies

By Josef Settele, O. Kudrna, Alexander Harpke, Ingolf Kühn, C. V. van Swaay, R. Verovnik, M. Warren, M. Wiemers, J. Hanspach, Thomas Hickler and 6 more. 2008

364 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e9339c7c926c4765402110212b5533b73b0ea6d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Patterns of beta diversity in Europe: the role of climate, land cover and distance across scales (2012, methodology): “This is relevant not only for scenario-based projections of distribution shifts in response to climate change and land-use changes (Thuiller et al., 2005; Jetz et al., 2007; Settele et al., 2008), but also for attempts to predict current distributions of species in poorly surveyed areas (Rocchini et”
European Red List of Butterflies (2010, background): “Climate change is already impacting some populations (in particular of tundra species like Colias hecla and Euphydryas iduna) and is likely to affect additional species more significantly in the future (Settele et al. 2008).”
Protected areas do not mitigate biodiversity declines: A case study on butterflies (2018, neutral): “…loss (Sang, Teder, Helm, & Pärtel, 2010), frag‐ mentation (Hanski, 2015; Krauss et al., 2010), habitat degradation (Stefanescu, Peñuelas, & Filella, 2009) or climate change (Oliver et al., 2015; Schweiger, Settele, Kudrna, Klotz, & Kühn, 2008; Settele, Bishop, & Potts, 2016; Settele et al., 2008).”
Climate change vulnerability assessment of species (2018, neutral): “…& Prentice, 2005), invertebrates (Harrison, Berry, Butt, & New, 2006; Heikkinen et al., 2010; Sánchez-Fernández, Lobo, & Hernández-Manrique, 2011; Settele et al., 2008) and vertebrates, including birds (Garcia, Burgess, Cabeza, Rahbek, & Araújo, 2012; Gregory et al., 2009; Hole et al., 2011),…”
Assessing the vulnerability of European butterflies to climate change using multiple criteria (2010, methodology): “Settele et al. (2008) reported that depending on the scenario used in the modelling, 3– 24% of the European butterflies may lose more than 95% of their present climatic niche under the no dispersal assumption.”
Global warming will affect the genetic diversity and uniqueness of Lycaena helle populations (2011, result): “Comparisons of our results with those presented by Settele et al. (2008) once more demonstrate these effects.”
Changes in nectar supply: A possible cause of widespread butterfly decline (2012, background): “Species nomenclature follows Settele et al. (2008). flower abundances are consistent, such trends should be expected to be an indicator for the trend of the associated flower group.”
Applying IUCN criteria to invertebrates: How red is the Red List of European butterflies? (2011, neutral): “, 2007) and butterflies (Settele et al., 2008) are powerful conservation tools and can, as shown here, be used as criterion A3c (i.”
Mediterranean island biodiversity and climate change: the last 10,000 years and the future (2016, background): “Although for most projections climate change seems to override land-use change effects (Thuiller et al. 2005a), changes in land-use (Settele et al. 2005) coupled with climate models predict modifications to species climate space (Settele et al. 2008; Louca et al. 2015).”
Pollinator Diversity: Distribution, Ecological Function, and Conservation (2017, background): “…the subject of climate change species distribution modeling approaches for some time, beginning with butterflies in the 1990s (Parmesan et al. 1999, Settele et al. 2008), largely because more data were available for that group of insects than for any other rather than because of their importance…”
A framework for assessing threats and benefits to species responding to climate change (2011, methodology): “Published maps of projected future distributions from Settele et al. (2008), using projections for 2080 for their intermediate level of climate change (BAMBU – A2), were the basis for estimating potential decreases (Stage II) and increases (Stage IV) of species between 1980 and 2080 (comparing…”
Increasing range mismatching of interacting species under global change is related to their ecological characteristics (2012, background): “Bioclimatic envelope models (Pearson & Dawson, 2003; Heikkinen et al., 2006) are widely used to provide first estimates about the projected impacts of global change on future distributions of many species (e.g. Pompe et al., 2008; Settele et al., 2008; Heikkinen et al., 2010).”