Evolution algorithms in combinatorial optimization
By Heinz Mühlenbein, M. Gorges-Schleuter, Ottmar Krämer. 1988
Subfields: Reinforcement Learning
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Reinforcement Learning
- Manuel Laguna
- Fred W. Glover
- Michel Gendreau
- Abhishek Gupta
- Thomas M. Smith
- Sergey Levine
- Pieter Abbeel
- Vikash Kumar
Citations in the corpus
- Technical report on Conversational Question Answering (2019, methodology): “Therefore they are widely used in combinatorial optimization and operation research problems(Deb, 1998; Mühlenbein et al., 1988).”
- Heuristics for multi-attribute vehicle routing problems: A survey and synthesis (2013, methodology): “The algorithms thus obtained are sometimes called " genetic local searches " (Mühlenbein et al. 1988) or " memetic algorithms " (Moscato 1989, Moscato and Cotta 2010).”
- The evolvability of artificial neural net-works for robot control (2002, methodology): “In population based evolutionary methods, there is considerable interest in the use of hybrid algorithms, typically incorporating some form of greedy hill-climbing into the evolutionary process (see for example Brady, 1985; Mühlenbein et al., 1988).”
- Multifactorial Evolutionary Algorithm With Online Transfer Parameter Estimation: MFEA-II (2020, background): “EAs offer immense flexibility in accommodating diverse data representations (be it continuous or combinatorial [32]), and scale fairly well to higher dimensions [33], [34].”
- USPEX - Evolutionary crystal structure prediction (2006, background): “, for the traveling salesman problem [14] and the problem of cluster optimization [15].”
- Insights on Transfer Optimization: Because Experience is the Best Teacher (2018, unknown): “searches [45], and combinatorial representations [46].”