Nanoscale Science and Engineering: Unifying and Transforming Tools

By Mihail C. Roco. 2004

188 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Environmental Chemistry, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e7cea91563b4870e9a1189bed55ba1cee82e6f8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. E. Valsami-Jones
2. Jan L. Youtie
3. Stuart J. H. Graham
4. M. Iacopetta
5. Mihail C. Roco
6. H. M. Azeredo

In Materials Chemistry

1. E. Valsami-Jones
2. Iseult Lynch
3. Eleonore Fröhlich

Citations in the corpus

• Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? (2008, background): “It is also expected that the field of nanotechnology will like ICT evolve in terms of complexity, with Roco (2004, 2005) suggesting that nanotechnology will undergo four generations of development over the next 20 years.”
• The long view of nanotechnology development: the National Nanotechnology Initiative at 10 years (2011, background): “It has become clear after about 60 countries developed nanotechnology activities by 2004 that without this definition and corresponding long-term vision, nanotechnology would have not been developed on the same accelerated, conceptually unifying and transforming path [4].”
• A strategy for grouping of nanomaterials based on key physico-chemical descriptors as a basis for safer-by-design NMs (2014, background): “ISO [2]); (iv) comlexity/functionality, from legacy NMs through so-called nd—4th generation NMs [3]; (v) modes of action [4], similar iopersistence/biokinetics [5,6] and/or parameters with a roven link to toxicological or biological response(s), i.”