Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology?

228 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Patent citation data in social science research: Overview and best practices (2017, unknown): “…to pin such patterns down or test their validity.9 JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY—June 2017 DOI: 10.1002/asi 1363 Youtie, Iacopetta, and Graham (2008) found that nanotechnology patents from 1990–1993 were more general than computer patents and much more general…”
The emergence of new technology-based sectors in European regions: A proximity-based analysis of nanotechnology (2014, background): “To do so, we follow Hidalgo et al. (2007) and Boschma et al.”
A Dynamic Network Measure of Technological Change (2017, background): “Although the STM was introduced five years before the AFM, the AFM offered several major improvements, including three-dimensional renderings and the ability to image living organisms (Youtie et al. 2008).”
Impact of public and private research funding on scientific production: The case of nanotechnology (2012, background): “Zucker et al. (2007) generally show the major impact that research financing has both on the publication of scientific articles and on patent production.”