Deregulating and regulatory reform in the U.S. electric power sector

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Experimental Evidence on the Economics of Rural Electrification (2020, background): “…decades, initiatives to restructure electricity markets around the world have been motivated by the view that while economies of scale are limited in generation, the transmission and distribution of electricity continue to exhibit standard characteristics of natural monopolies ( Joskow 2000).”
The Trouble With Electricity Markets: Understanding California's Restructuring Disaster (2002, background): “Joskow (2000) discusses the pros and cons of these organizational structures in detail.”
Lessons Learned From Electricity Market Liberalization (2008, background): “…high retail prices, and falling costs of production from new facilities driven by low prices for natural gas and the development of more efficient generating technologies (e.g. CCGT), stimulated pressures for changes that would reduce electricity costs and retail prices (Joskow 1998, 2000a).”
Markets for Power in the United States: An Interim Assessment (2006, unknown): “…sector’s legacy industry structure built upon a large number of regulated vertically integrated monopolies and nearly 150 network control areas was not conducive to creating well functioning competitive wholesale and retail electricity markets (Joskow and Schmalensee (1983), Joskow (2000, 2005a)).”
The Difficult Transition to Competitive Electricity Markets in the U.S (2003, unknown): “time (Joskow, 2000).”