Accounting for sequestered carbon: the question of permanence

By G. Marland, Kristy Fruit, R. Sedjo. 2001

252 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e46a7998f2b818fac9d9b1b8ff31ec32a30dfc4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. B. Sohngen
2. B. Murray

In Global and Planetary Change

1. B. Sohngen

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. B. Murray

Citations in the corpus

• Inter-trading permanent emissions credits and rented temporary carbon emissions offsets: some issues and alternatives (2003, background): “Marland et al. (2001)discuss further economic and environmental reasons for which it may be advantageous for some parties to acquire temporary credits and for others to provide temporary credits for carbon sequestration, even when it is understood that sequestration is not likely to be permanent.”
• Economic consequences of consideration of permanence, leakage and additionality for soil carbon sequestration projects (2007, background): “Ministry of the Environment 2000; Blanco and Forner 2000; and Chomitz 2000); & carbon “rental” (see Marland et al. 2001 ); and & carbon “leasing” (see Moura Costa 1996; Dutschke 2001, 2002).”