'I'm in and you're out . . . '

By L. Owens, R. Shute, Phillip Thomas Slee. 2000

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

It’s “Mean,” But What Does It Mean to Adolescents? Relational Aggression Described by Victims, Aggressors, and Their Peers (2010, background): “In one of the earliest qualitative studies of indirect forms of relational aggression, Owens, Shute, and Slee (2000a) interviewed Australian adolescent girls (aged 15 and 16) to describe their perceived reasons for indirect aggression, defined as “more subtle psychological forms,” and was…”
Sex differences in indirect aggression : Psychological evidence from young adults (2006, background): “Owens, Shute, and Slee (2000a, 2000b), for example, showed that girls' aggressive tactics included gossip, ostracism, breaking confidences, and criticism of a victim's clothing, appearance, or personality.”
Predictors of victimisation across direct bullying, indirect bullying and cyberbullying (2012, result): “The descriptive findings on the prevalence of traditional victimisation in terms of gender (Table 2) confirm much previous research; males are more represented among victims of direct bullying and females more as victims of indirect bullying (Owens, Shute, and Slee 2000; Russell et al. 2003).”