Sex differences in indirect aggression : Psychological evidence from young adults

By Nicole H. Hess, Edward Hagen. 2006

256 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f9a47eb67b34c130f3ba1745878b88f0752320b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Steven A. Arnocky

In Social Psychology

1. Jessie L. Miller
2. Steven A. Arnocky
3. Shafik A. Sunderani
4. T. Vaillancourt

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jessie L. Miller
2. Steven A. Arnocky
3. Shafik A. Sunderani
4. T. Vaillancourt

Citations in the corpus

• The Social Costs and Benefits of Anger as a Function of Gender and Relationship Context (2011, unknown): “Gender differences in this form of anger expression can be inferred from research on relational aggression that indicates that women show more relational aggression than do men (Archer 2004; Hess and Hagen 2006), but again this line of research usually does not examine the role of anger.”
• Jealousy mediates the relationship between attractiveness comparison and females' indirect aggression (2012, background): “Conversely, when the perpetration of indirect aggression is considered, the female role has been elucidated as more than one of passivity and unprovoked victimization (see Bjorkqvist, 1994; Campbell, 1999; Hess & Hagen, 2006, for review).”