Managing Uncertainties in Networks a Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making

By J. Koppenjan, E. Klijn. 2004

840 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e24d7a60b43ce9f8d6471c9ac029d09a49417bb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Institutional design for complex technological systems (2005, background): “Such an analysis will also identify at which level one can best design: is there a need for an institutional arrangement, adaptation of a law, or for a cultural change? Perhaps if communication between parties at Level 1 can be improved, there may be no need for institutional adaptation after all (K”
Resilience and robustness in policy design: a critical appraisal (2017, background): “Researchers have also long noted the importance of polycentrism (Ostrom 1990, 1998) and stakeholder participation (Atkinson and Coleman 1992; Rhodes 1997; Dryzek 2000; Koppenjan and Klijn 2004a) in solving complex problems and in ensuring greater resilience in the policy process.”
Towards Adaptive Management: Examining the Strategies of Policy Entrepreneurs in Dutch Water Management (2011, background): “At the same time, when people feel angry, offended, annoyed, or betrayed, negotiations can be very difficult (Fisher et al. 1983, Koppenjan and Klijn 2004).”
Governance and Governance Networks in Europe (2008, background): “One could even say that, in governance processes, politics is ‘dissolved’ or ‘displaced’ from the classical political institutions in a network of actors (Koppenjan and Klijn 2004; Klijn and Skelcher 2007).7 (4) Governance is composed of self-governing networks.”
The Gaming of Policy and the Politics of Gaming: A Review (2009, background): “…politics (Allison, 1971), the garbage can model (Cohen et al., 1972), the policy stream model (Kingdon, 1995) and network theory (de Bruijn & ten Heuvelhof, 2000; de Bruijn, ten Heuvelhof, & In’t Veld, 2002; Koppenjan & Klijn, 2004) are considered to be more in line with political reality.”
Enhancing the Fit through Adaptive Co-management: Creating and Maintaining Bridging Functions for Matching Scales in the Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve, Sweden (2007, background): “Bridging organizations can provide strategies for managing social networks in order to deal with uncertainty (in the sense of Koppenjan and Klijn 2004).”
Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons (2019, background): “…concerning polycentric governance and other similar concepts, such as multi-level governance (Hooghe & Marks, 2001) and network governance (Koppenjan & Klijn, 2004; Provan & Kenis, 2007) could prove very useful in advancing our understanding of polycentricity in complex governance systems…”
Theory-driven approaches to analysing collaborative performance (2008, background): “The contributions of Kickert et al. (1997), Koppenjan and Klijn (2004) and others understand networks as important elements in the governance of contemporary societies, acting to steer and regulate in the absence of centralized authority.”
Governance network theory: Past, present and future (2012, background): “Rules facilitate interaction in networks, thus reducing transaction costs and influencing the performance of networks (Ostrom, 1986; Koppenjan and Klijn, 2004).”
Understanding the Complex Dynamics of Transparency (2013, background): “Still, the literature on public management (e.g., Koppenjan and Klijn 2004) shows that holding diff ering positions does not have to form an insurmountable barrier to joint learning if various stakeholders acknowledge some kind of interdependence.”