Geographic Concentration and Establishment Scale

By T. Holmes, John J. Stevens. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2002

232 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e1a2712e7e01e70db2f98c19300ad19d9e020ce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

EXPLORING THE DETAILED LOCATION PATTERNS OF U.K. MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES USING MICROGEOGRAPHIC DATA (2008, unknown): “Our analysis also revisits issues ﬁrst raised by Holmes and Stevens (2002) to ask whether larger establishments are more localised than smaller.”
The mechanisms of agglomeration: Evidence from the effect of inter-industry relations on the location of new firms (2011, background): “Other studies have tested the relevance of the input sharing mechanism, including Bartlesman et al (1994), Holmes (1999), Holmes and Stevens (2002) and Li”
Spatial concentration and location dynamics in logistics:the case of a Dutch province (2013, unknown): “This is in line with earlier research of Holmes and Stevens (2002) that concluded that the size of establishments in concentration areas is generally larger than the size of establishments outside these areas.”
Industry structure, entrepreneurship, and culture: An empirical analysis using historical coalfields (2016, background): “This location pattern may lead to persistence in the share of large firms (e.g., Holmes and Stevens, 2002; Barrios et al., 2006).”
Local Industrial Conditions and Entrepreneurship: How Much of the Spatial Distribution Can We Explain? (2009, unknown): “More generally, empirical evidence exists that small and large establishments agglomerate differently (e.g., Holmes and Stevens, 2002; Duranton and Overman, 2008), and it is useful to extend this description to entering firms.”
Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies (2004, background): “Holmes and Stevens (2002) is also relevant to input sharing, although it does not address the issue directly.”
Firm Location and the Creation and Utilization of Human Capital (2007, background): “…to the empirical Þndings by Henderson (1986) and Ciccone and Hall (1996) that productivity increases with the density of the economic activity and by Holmes and Stevens (2002) that plant sizes are higher within industry clusters.9 The conventional interpretation of these Þndings is that because of…”