EXPLORING THE DETAILED LOCATION PATTERNS OF U.K. MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES USING MICROGEOGRAPHIC DATA

By Gilles Duranton, Henry G. Overman. 2008

277 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/81715a63ede44c5ef96b820a43f740c9f22ac971

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

California Dreamin’: The Feeble Case for Cluster Policies (2011, background): “In further research, Duranton and Overman (2008) also look at the co-localisation of industries related through input-output linkages.”
Measures of the geographic concentration of industries: improving distance-based methods (2010, background): “11 See for instance Fratesi (2008) for an empirical application of the Kd or Arbia and Espa (1996), Barff (1987), Ó hUallacháin and Leslie (2007) and Arbia et al.”
Local Industrial Conditions and Entrepreneurship: How Much of the Spatial Distribution Can We Explain? (2009, background): “More generally, empirical evidence exists that small and large establishments agglomerate differently (e.g., Holmes and Stevens, 2002; Duranton and Overman, 2008), and it is useful to extend this description to entering firms.”
Models of regional growth: past, present and future (2011, unknown): “The latter has recently been used to construct a measure of absorptive capacity (Harris and Li, 2008), while the use of the ARD has resulted in a number of studies already (see Harris and Trainor, 2005; Duranton and Overman, 2006).”
Who Benefits from Agglomeration? (2015, methodology): “While most reports of the agglomeration of economic activity tend to be rather crude, rigorous tests of the spatial clustering of establishments using distance-based methods were provided by FESER and SWEENEY (2000), MARCON and PUECH (2003), and DURANTON and OVERMAN (2005, 2008).”