A sharp interface method for incompressible two-phase flows

By Mark Sussman, Kayne M. Smith, M. Yousuff Hussaini, Mitsuhiro Ohta, Zhijian Rong. Journal of Computational Physics, 2007

447 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7df996a8f743e8eb15dad069454317454f754ed5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

Citations in the corpus

A three-dimensional sharp interface model for self-consistent keyhole and weld pool dynamics in deep penetration laser welding (2011, background): “However, it has been shown in [29, 30] that the maximum magnitude of parasite currents near the free surface is only in the order of 0.”
Two‐phase flows in karstic geometry (2014, background): “The sharp interface models have been very successful in explaining many physically interesting phenomena [2, 3, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33].”
A balanced force refined level set grid method for two-phase flows on unstructured flow solver grids (2008, unknown): “Ma”
A brief review of the phase-field-based lattice Boltzmann method for multiphase flows (2019, methodology): “The current numerical methods for multiphase flow problems can be divided into two categories: the sharp-interface ( Sun and Beckermann, 2007; Sussman et al., 2007) and the diffuse-interface approaches (Anderson et al.”
An accurate adaptive solver for surface-tension-driven interfacial flows (2009, methodology): “Coupling vof, levelset and gfm can be used to overcome the individual drawbacks of each method [23, 61, 43], however this introduces two different representations of the same interface with the associated complexity, efficiency and consistency issues. In the context of vof methods, the original Cont”
Influence of surface tension implementation in Volume of Fluid and coupled Volume of Fluid with Level Set methods for bubble growth and detachment (2013, methodology): “, 2000), or based on coupled Level Set and Volume of Fluid methods (Sussman et al., 2007; Ohta et al., 2011).”
An accurate conservative level set/ghost fluid method for simulating turbulent atomization (2008, unknown): “While these values are slightly larger than those obtained by previous studies that benefited from higher order curvature computations [7,30,31], they remain very small, and have not been found to affect the accuracy of the computed solutions in an unreasonable way.”