An accurate conservative level set/ghost fluid method for simulating turbulent atomization

By Olivier Desjardins, Vincent Moureau, Heinz Pitsch. Journal of Computational Physics, 2008

458 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Evaluating the performance of the two-phase flow solver interFoam (2012, background): “The evaluation of global errors for advection test cases, as shown in the preceding section, is a common exercise in the assessment of new interfacial capturing methodologies [30–33, 36, 38, 48–50, 55, 56, 80, 82, 86, 87].”
An accurate adaptive solver for surface-tension-driven interfacial flows (2009, methodology): “The source code of the implementation is freely available as part of the Gerris flow solver.”
Numerical Models of Surface Tension (2018, methodology): “…in the past twenty-five years, with the development of higher-order geometric VOF methods which guarantee non-diffusive, sharp interface motion (Gueyffier et al. 1999), conservative levelset (Desjardins et al. 2008, Feng et al. 2011) or coupled VOF-levelset methods (Sussman & Puckett 2000).”
A conservative local interface sharpening scheme for the constrained interpolation profile method (2012, methodology): “The method by Olsson and Kreiss is applied to the two-phase flow [17] and the turbulent flow [18, 19] with several improvements.”