The Fatty Liver Index: a simple and accurate predictor of hepatic steatosis in the general population

By G. Bedogni, S. Bellentani, L. Miglioli, F. Masutti, M. Passalacqua, A. Castiglione, C. Tiribelli. BMC Gastroenterology, 2006

2,637 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BackgroundFatty liver (FL) is the most frequent liver disease in Western countries. We used data from the Dionysos Nutrition & Liver Study to develop a simple algorithm for the prediction of FL in the general population.Methods216 subjects with and 280 without suspected liver disease were studied. FL was diagnosed by ultrasonography and alcohol intake was assessed using a 7-day diary. Bootstrapped stepwise logistic regression was used to identify potential predictors of FL among 13 variables of interest [gender, age, ethanol intake, alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, gamma-glutamyl-transferase (GGT), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, sum of 4 skinfolds, glucose, insulin, triglycerides, and cholesterol]. Potential predictors were entered into stepwise logistic regression models with the aim of obtaining the most simple and accurate algorithm for the prediction of FL.ResultsAn algorithm based on BMI, waist circumference, triglycerides and GGT had an accuracy of 0.84 (95%CI 0.81–0.87) in detecting FL. We used this algorithm to develop the "fatty liver index" (FLI), which varies between 0 and 100. A FLI < 30 (negative likelihood ratio = 0.2) rules out and a FLI ≥ 60 (positive likelihood ratio = 4.3) rules in fatty liver.ConclusionFLI is simple to obtain and may help physicians select subjects for liver ultrasonography and intensified lifestyle counseling, and researchers to select patients for epidemiologic studies. Validation of FLI in external populations is needed before it can be employed for these purposes.

Subfields: Epidemiology, Hepatology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7df80bb1b4e23999a7cc9105e2e792b1a56396c4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Epidemiology

  1. C. Day
  2. S. Bellentani
  3. V. Ratziu
  4. Giulio Marchesini
  5. H. Cortez‐Pinto
  6. T. Nakagawa
  7. Richard J. Johnson
  8. A. Diehl

In Hepatology

  1. C. Day
  2. A. Diehl
  3. S. Bellentani

In Pathology and Forensic Medicine

  1. C. Day
  2. S. Bellentani
  3. E. Bugianesi
  4. F. B. Hu

Citations in the corpus