DOMINANCE HIERARCHIES IN FEMALE MOUNTAIN GOATS: STABILITY, AGGRESSIVENESS AND DETERMINANTS OF RANK

By Steeve D. Côté. 2000

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ddb3c229e3d908d7bf8bab74e0f4d2c8a5ca56d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Small Animals

Citations in the corpus

Assessing dominance hierarchies: validation and advantages of progressive evaluation with Elo-rating (2011, methodology): “On a long-term basis, stability has also been characterised by 289 comparison of rankings in consecutive seasons using regression or correlation analysis 290 (e.g., in mountain goats, Côté 2000).”
Social competition and its consequences in female mammals (2013, background): “mountain goats (Cote 2000), meerkats (Clutton-Brock et al.”
Long-term dominance relationships in female mountain gorillas: strength, stability and determinants of rank (2005, background): “Any reproductive advantages she gains while dominant may be offset by the disadvantages from when she was subordinate (Gouzoules et al., 1982; Alados & Escos, 1992; Coté, 2000).”
Trade-offs in activity budget in an alpine ungulate: contrasting lactating and nonlactating females (2008, methodology): “We considered an encounter resolved when one of the opponents withdrew and, for each dyad, we scored an individual as dominant if it won more than 50% of the interactions with the other individual (Côté 2000).”
Reproductive success in female mountain goats: the influence of age and social rank (2001, methodology): “Social rank did not affect these relationships, because neither social rank nor age-specific social rank was correlated with adult female mass (Côté 2000b).”
Social cohesion in yellow-bellied marmots is established through age and kin structuring (2010, unknown): “…with increasing age or size (female African elephants, Loxodonta africana: Archie et al. 2006; female mountain goats, Oreamnos americanus: Côté 2000;male long-tailed manakins, Chiroxiphia linearis: McDonald 1989), and have associated fitness consequences (mountain goats: Côté &…”
Sexual selection and social rank in bighorn rams (2006, methodology): “life (when there are large age-related differences in size) are maintained in later years, even though the difference in size between members of a dyad may disappear or even be reversed (Thouless & Guinness 1986; Côté 2000).”
Personality and foraging decisions in fallow deer, Dama dama (2011, unknown): “2004) and psychological characteristics (Côté 2000).”
A social network perspective on measurements of dominance hierarchies (2012, unknown): “ 1976, Table 3 17 0.051 1.000 1.000 0.847 0.868 0.000 0.000 Collias & Taber 1951, Table 3 9 0.583 1.000 1.000 0.167 0.415 0.300 0.260 Collias Taber 1951, Table 4 8 0.464 1.000 1.000 0.161 0.430 0.325 0.097 Collias Taber 1951, Table 5 14 0.440 0.905 0.”
Habitat use patterns in relation to escape terrain : are alpine ungulate females trading off better foraging sites for safety? (2007, methodology): “Because age is highly correlated with social rank in female mountain goats (r > 0.9; Côté 2000), we used the residuals of the regression of social rank on age (hereafter age-specific social rank) in all analyses.”
Resting pattern and social interactions in goats—The impact of size and organisation of lying space (2007, background): “…that dominance is relatively mild and not so clear in wild or feral goats (e.g. Stewart and Scott, 1947; Scott, 1948), whereas others find clear dominance relationships (e.g. Schaller, 1977; Hart, 1985) and a relatively stable hierarchic order within the flock (Barroso et al., 2000; Cote, 2000).”