Optimum honeycomb filled crash absorber design

By Hamid Reza Zarei, Matthias Kröger. 2008

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7dc48cde5f9a4e774c48b3be89fae53c6d860f43

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. A. Baroutaji
2. A. Olabi
3. Shujuan Hou
4. M. Sajjia
5. S. Long
6. Zhenting Lin
7. Dong-dong Wang

In Mechanical Engineering

1. A. Baroutaji
2. A. Olabi
3. Shujuan Hou
4. M. Sajjia
5. Xujing Yang
6. Wei Li
7. S. Long
8. Qing Li

In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

1. A. Olabi
2. M. Sajjia
3. Shujuan Hou
4. Xujing Yang
5. A. Baroutaji
6. Wei Li
7. S. Long

Citations in the corpus

• On the crashworthiness performance of thin-walled energy absorbers: Recent advances and future developments (2017, methodology): “MCF was also used in a contradictory way in the optimisation studies where some researchers [185], [235] suggested low levels for MCF to reduce the injuries risk and others [236] maintained high MCF to increase the energy absorption capacity.”
• Crashworthiness design for foam filled thin-wall structures (2009, background): “More recently, Zarei and Kroger [20, 21 ] also explored multi-design optimization (MDO) for geometric parameters of foam-filled tubes on basis of validating the simulation with experimental test.”