Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights

By Dietmar Harhoff, F. Scherer, Katrin Vopel. 2003

1,480 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7dbf56337b9a60370abd15da2b511bd3ac60aad6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Patent citation data in social science research: Overview and best practices (2017, neutral): “Harhoff, Scherer, and Vopel (2003) obtained estimates from patent holders of the private value of 772 patents with a 1977 German priority date, and that were maintained to full term.”
Environmental Policy and Directed Technological Change: Evidence from the European Carbon Market (2012, background): “Counting the number of countries in which a patent is filed is another common measure of patent quality (Harhoff et al., 2003; van Zeebroeck, 2011).”
Chinese university patents: quantity, quality, and the role of subsidy programs (2014, neutral): “Forward citations are the citations that a patent receives by subsequent patents (Harhoff et al. 2003).”
Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano science and technology (2007, background): “Harhoff et al (2003) and Lanjouw and Schankerman (2001) have suggested a different metrics, i.e. the existence of litigation for patents, implying that patents for which assignees are willing to pay for defence against infringement, have larger economic value.”
Young firms and innovation: A microeconometric analysis (2012, background): “See also Hall (1996), Hall (2000), Mairesse and Mohnen (2002), Harhoff et al. (2003) and Hall et al. (2005). main limitations.”
Commercializing academic research: the quality of faculty patenting (2011, background): “For instance, Jaffe (1989) has shown that university research contributes to state-level corporate patenting.”
Do tax incentives for research increase firm innovation? An RD design for R&D (2016, neutral): “24 For example, see Hall, Jaffe, and Trajtenberg (2005) on US firms or Blundell, Griffith, and Van Reenen (1999) on UK firms. 25 Variations of these quality measures have been used by inter alia Lanjouw et al. (1998), Harhoff et al.”
Recent Research on the Economics of Patents (2012, neutral): “ Another way 14 Harhoff et al. (2003), p. 1348.”
Environmental Policy Design Characteristics and Technological Innovation: Evidence from Patent Data (2010, background): “6 See Guellec and van Pottelsberghe (2000) and Harhoff et al. (2003) for empirical evidence supporting this approach.”
Do Important Inventions Benefit from Knowledge Originating in Other Technological Domains (2012, background): “…of the assignee firm (Hall et al., 2005), interviews with inventors (Harhoff et al., 1999), payment of patent renewal fees (Griliches et al., 1987; Harhoff et al., 1999, 2003), whether a lawsuit was filed (Allison et al., 2004), and filling patents for the same invention in multiple countries…”
Innovation and diffusion of clean/green technology: Can patent commons help? (2013, neutral): “(1998) and Harhoff et al. (2003).”