Infection genetics: gene-for-gene versus matching-alleles models and all points in between

By A. Agrawal, C. Lively. 2002

395 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d385cf88429038bd393b071a082ade89677cd19

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. E. Domingo
2. Mark E. J. Woolhouse
3. J. Webster
4. B. Charlesworth
5. B. Levin
6. S. Gandon
7. Root Gorelick
8. C. Do

Citations in the corpus

• Biological and biomedical implications of the co-evolution of pathogens and their hosts (2002, background): “On the other hand, costs of resistance in the host coupled with costs of infectivity in the pathogen can drive co-evolution that would not otherwise occu”
• HOST PARASITE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN FRESHWATER PHYTOPLANKTON AND CHYTRID FUNGI (CHYTRIDIOMYCOTA) 1 (2004, unknown): “9) (Agrawal and Lively 2002a,b).”
• Population mixing accelerates coevolution (2003, unknown): “This contrasts with the matching alleles genetic system, which allows only specialist genotypes and can result in fluctuating epistasis ( Agrawal & Lively 2002 ).”
• Local adaptation and the geometry of host–parasite coevolution (2002, methodology): “More recently, Agrawal & Lively, 2002 ) studied a general model which allows the GFG of Flor (1956) and the matching allele model used here to appear as two extreme cases (two ends of a continuum).”