Hypothesis Testing: From p Values to Bayes Factors

72 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Commentary: practical advantages of Bayesian analysis of epidemiologic data. (2001, background): “For a brief review of the debate, the reader can refer to a recent paper by Marden (37).”
Why P Values Are Not a Useful Measure of Evidence in Statistical Significance Testing (2008, background): “Indeed, as Marden (2000) points out, the p value is not very useful with large sample sizes.”
Final Collapse of the Neyman-Pearson Decision Theoretic Framework and Rise of the neoFisherian (2009, background): “…of significance tests by scientists (Grant 1962, Henkel 1976, Oakes 1986, Sedlmeier & Gigerenzer 1989, Cohen 1990, Altman 1991, Inman 1994, Schmidt 1996, Hurlbert 1998, Johnson 1999, Marden 2000, Tryon 2001, Hurlbert & Lombardi 2003, Balluerka et al. 2005, Levine et al. 2008a, b).”