Open Innovation: A research agenda
By H. Chesbrough, Wpm Wim Vanhaverbeke, Joel West. 2006
337 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ca2fa8b57acd9e84d61cfcca573c0e1b6030b3e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Marcel Bogers
- Agnieszka Radziwon
- Göran Smith
- Joel West
- Simona Gentile-Lüdecke
- H. Chesbrough
- Andrés Barge-Gil
- Jana Sochor
Citations in the corpus
- Open innovation in SMEs: Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an ecosystem (2017, background): “Secondly, while our study takes the ecosystem with embedded SMEs as a unit of analysis for understanding open innovation processes and practices, further research could focus more on different – possibly also multiple – levels of analysis (Gupta et al., 2007; West et al., 2006).”
- The Process of Creative Construction: Knowledge Spillovers, Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth (2007, unknown): “In the open innovation system, spillovers are integrated into the company’s business model, and are treated as an opportunity to expand a fi rm’s core activities or to spin off a technology and, thus, create a new business model (West et al., 2006).”
- Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation (2014, unknown): “In this category were 15 publications: 11 articles already in the database, 3 books authored or coauthored by Chesbrough (Chesbrough, 2003a, 2006b; Chesbrough et al., 2006), and 1 book chapter by Chesbrough (2006a).4 The four 4 If instead of 100 citations, the Google Scholar threshold was set to 50…”
- Public–private innovation: barriers in the case of mobility as a service in West Sweden (2019, methodology): “Drawing on the levels of analysis initially proposed by West, Vanhaverbeke, and Chesbrough (2006), and increasingly embraced among OI scholars (e.g. Bogers et al. 2017; Mergel 2017), we adopt a classification of the main barrier types identified in extant literature as illustrated in Table 1.”
- Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model (2010, background): “009 from the mainstream (West et al., 2006) for the following reasons.”
- Task Design, Motivation, and Participation in Crowdsourcing Contests (2011, background): “In the past, open innovation was conducted through interorganizational linkages and communities where firms collaborate with one another [71, 72].”