Measuring psychological well-being in the Chinese

By Sheung-Tak Cheng, A. Chan. 2005

188 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c7dfea0c3e8e14084974bf64554fc7a9e2b9cbb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. C. Ryff
2. Dirk van Dierendonck
3. J. Freese
4. K. Springer
5. Burton H. Singer
6. R. Hauser
7. Richard A. Burns
8. M. Anthony Machin

In Social Psychology

1. C. Ryff
2. Burton H. Singer
3. Dirk van Dierendonck
4. B. Moreno-Jiménez
5. Darío Díaz
6. Raquel Rodriguez-Carvajal
7. Amalio Blanco
8. K. Springer

Citations in the corpus

• Ryff’s Six-factor Model of Psychological Well-being, A Spanish Exploration (2008, background): “Other studies also emphasized the necessity to remove items with too much content overlap between dimensions (e.g., Abbott et al. 2006; Cheng and Chan 2005 ).”
• Bad news indeed for Ryff’s six-factor model of well-being (2006, methodology): “6 Neither Van Dierendonck (2004) nor Cheng and Chan (2005) report these correlations.”
• Best news yet on the six-factor model of well-being (2006, background): “The remaining five studies include Clarke et al. (2001), Ryff and Keyes (1995), Van Dierendonck (2004), Chen and Chan (2005), and Springer and Hauser (2005).”
• Know Thyself and Become What You Are: A Eudaimonic Approach to Psychological Well-Being (2008, methodology): “Five such studies (Cheng and Chan, 2005; Clarke et al., 2001; Ryff and Keyes, 1995; Springer and Hauser, in press; van Dierendonck, 2004), all using confirmatory factor analyses, have TABLE I Definitions of theory-guided dimensions of well-being Self-acceptance High scorer: Possesses a positive…”