Four Ingredients: New Recipes for Procedural Justice in Australian Policing

By Jane Goodman-Delahunty. 2010

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c53122c4273dd997e364d22c1d8b2551dab3533

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Lorraine Mazerolle
2. Sarah Bennett
3. E. Sargeant
4. N. Todak
5. Tom Tyler
6. Lois James

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Sarah Bennett
2. Lorraine Mazerolle
3. E. Sargeant
4. M. Manning
5. N. Todak
6. Tom Tyler
7. E. Antrobus
8. Jacqueline Davis

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Lorraine Mazerolle
2. Sarah Bennett
3. E. Sargeant
4. M. Manning
5. Jacqueline Davis
6. E. Antrobus
7. N. Todak
8. Tom Tyler

Citations in the corpus

• Shaping Citizen Perceptions of Police Legitimacy: A Randomized Field Trial of Procedural Justice (2013, background): “…drawing from previous research that found that perceptions of police legitimacy influence compliance and cooperation (e.g., Reisig, Bratton, and Gertz, 2007; Sunshine and Tyler, 2003) as well as feelings of satisfaction toward the police (Elliott, Thomas, and Ogloff, 2011; Goodman-Delahunty, 2010).”
• A Systematic Social Observation Study of Police De-Escalation Tactics (2018, background): “This is important considering that feeling respected is a key component of citizens’ procedural justice evaluations (Goodman-Delahunty, 2010), which are strongly linked to police legitimacy (Mazerolle et al., 2013).”
• Procedural justice and police legitimacy: a systematic review of the research evidence (2013, background): “…(or citizen voice), leads people to perceive neutrality in decision making, shows that the authority demonstrated dignity and respect throughout the interaction, and conveys that the authority has trustworthy motives (Goodman-Delahunty 2010; Tyler 2008; Tyler and Huo 2002; Tyler and Murphy 2011).”