Sharing and neoliberal discourse: The economic function of sharing in the digital on-demand economy

By Daniel G. Cockayne. 2016

262 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c026aa9f3c2d8aa4c2a5c268f6404e958d0f1a9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Marketing

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Sharing versus collaborative economy: how to align ICT developments and the SDGs in tourism? (2019, background): “The corporate vision of the sharing economy is fundamentally different from the original understanding (Botsman & Rogers, 2011), and has been described as “platform capitalism” (Srnicek, 2017) and the latest form of neoliberal global economic development (Cockayne, 2016; Ravenelle, 2017).”
Conceptualizing the Sharing Economy through Presenting a Comprehensive Framework (2018, background): “Even so, Cockayne (2016) expresses SE as “a term that describes digital platforms that connect consumers to a service or commodity through the use of a mobile application or website” [108] (p. 73), and Laurell and Sandström (2017) recognize the SE as being ICT-enabled platforms, which are used for…”
Platform economies and urban planning: Airbnb and regulated deregulation in London (2018, background): “…have mainly focused on the economics of short-term letting and on the challenges it poses to established hospitality industries and forms of labour (Cockayne, 2016; Edelman and Geradin, 2015; Schor, 2014), less emphasis has been placed on how the activities and Corresponding author: Mara Ferreri,…”
A decade of the sharing economy: Concepts, users, business and governance perspectives (2020, unknown): “The understanding is emerging that professionalisation and commercialisation of originally communal forms of sharing might have implications for their sustainability ambitions, but empirical evidence is lacking (Cockayne, 2016).”
Ridesourcing, the sharing economy, and the future of cities (2018, background): “There have been an increasing number of studies discussing the social, economic, and environmental impact of the sharing economy (e.g., Cockayne, 2016; Frenken & Schor, 2017; Martin, 2016).”
Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: An organizing framework (2017, background): “To add to the confusion, many neighbouring concepts have been proposed including platform capitalism, on-demand (Cockayne, 2016) or gig economy (Friedman, 2014; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.006 ⁎ Corresponding author.”
Defining the Sharing Economy for Sustainability (2019, background): “Furthermore, intangible objects discussed in literature include time banks [48,132], crowdfunding [38,41,131] and knowledge-sharing [41,131,133].”
Welcome to the Gig Economy: neoliberal industrial relations and the case of Uber (2017, background): “Cockayne (2016) argues that the ‘sharing economy’ is no more than an attempt to normalize precarious work relations through discourse of capitalist exchange and altruistic social values.”