Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis.
By L. Huwart, C. Sempoux, E. Vicaut, N. Salameh, L. Annet, E. Danse, F. Peeters, L. T. ter Beek, J. Rahier, R. Sinkus and 2 more. Gastroenterology, 2008
735 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Epidemiology, Hepatology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7bfda9d996faae564b0bc4bdc7d879d3d28e54f8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Epidemiology
In Hepatology
In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
Citations in the corpus
- Comparison of laboratory tests, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance elastography to detect fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A meta‐analysis (2017, background): “Some investigators have discussed the possible reasons why MRE is more accurate than FibroScan for staging fibrosis and its advantages.((13,24)) In our previous meta-analysis, we showed that the summary AUROC values of APRI and FIB-4 for the diagnosis of SF, AF, and cirrhosis are 0.”
- EASL-ALEH Clinical Practice Guidelines: Non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis. (2015, background): “Two studies (a pilot Belgian study [193] and a Japanese retrospective study [195] in 96 and 113 patients with”
- Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver: Technique, Analysis and Clinical Applications (2013, background): “Studies comparing the MRE with Fibroscan are few (27,47).”
- Diagnosis and Management of Autoimmune Hepatitis in Adults and Children: 2019 Practice Guidance and Guidelines From the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (2019, background): “The findings of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) correlate strongly with fibrosis stage, and MRE appears to outperform VCTE for staging hepatic fibrosis in some studies performed in other liver diseases.(266-269) Furthermore, MRE assessment of splenic stiffness can have prognostic value for pre”
- Non-invasive assessment and quantification of liver steatosis by ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance. (2009, background): “As it was shown for the assessment of steatosis the non-invasive staging of liver fibrosis is a further challenge in current liver research [153].”
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging More Accurately Classifies Steatosis and Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Than Transient Elastography. (2016, background): “Multiple studies have also shown that MRE-based LSM provides an accurate biomarker for detecting the presence of fibrosis in patients with chronic liver dysfunction [20-24].”
- Elastography for the diagnosis of severity of fibrosis in chronic liver disease: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. (2011, methodology): “From these, three studies were excluded, as they evaluated magnetic resonance elastography [4], real time elastography [27] or used a probe especially built for children [23].”
- Accuracy of real‐time shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: A pilot study (2012, result): “In this study, the correlation between liver stiffness values, assessed either with real-time SWE or TE, and fibrosis stage were not affected by steatosis or necroinflammation, which is in agreement with previous studies assessing liver elasticity with TE or MRE.8-10,33,34 However, most patients in ”