Fire and Ice in Marital Communication: Hostile and Distancing Behaviors as Predictors of Marital Distress
By L. Roberts. 2000
130 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ba14ead6a1e45a1bc26a82271dc46f98c0f73df
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- Paul R. Amato
- Denise Previti
- M. Mills
- Kadri Täht
- C. Gudmunson
- Daniel J. Canary
- Tamara D. Afifi
- Shannon Cavanagh
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Denise Previti
- M. Mills
- Paul R. Amato
- Kadri Täht
- M. Tafoya
- C. Gudmunson
- Alan L. Sillars
- Daniel J. Canary
In Social Psychology
- Paul R. Amato
- Denise Previti
- E. Jeffrey Hill
- M. Mills
- Kadri Täht
- M. Tafoya
- C. Gudmunson
- Alan L. Sillars
Citations in the corpus
- Linking Financial Strain to Marital Instability: Examining the Roles of Emotional Distress and Marital Interaction (2007, background): “Roberts (2000) compared the effects of hostile and distancing behaviors on husbands’ and wives’ marital distress and found that wives were most distressed by their husbands’ hostile behaviors, and husbands were more distressed by wives’ distancing behaviors.”
- People's Reasons for Divorcing (2003, result): “Nevertheless, this result is consistent with a study showing that communication problems (such as avoiding problem-solving discussions) predict marital unhappiness more strongly among husbands than wives (Roberts, 2000).”
- Communication, conflict, and the quality of family relationships. (2004, background): “In addition, indirectness can be functional in some relationships and contexts, but not others (Fitzpatrick, Fallis, & Vance, 1982; Raush, Barry, Hertel, & Swain, 1974; Roberts, 2000)—an issue we elaborate below.”
- Nonstandard Work Schedules and Partnership Quality: Quantitative and Qualitative Findings (2010, background): “Under such circumstances, it may be that interaction assumes a pattern of one partner demanding more engagement and the other exhibiting avoidance through withdrawal, thus resulting in relationship dissatisfaction (Roberts, 2000).”
- A Meta-Analytical Review of the Demand/Withdraw Pattern of Interaction and its Associations with Individual, Relational, and Communicative Outcomes (2014, unknown): “…used inventories based on conflict resolution strategies (e.g., Gottman & Krokoff, 1989; Kurdek, 1994) and interactional response patterns (e.g., Roberts, 2000), whereas others conducting observational research have used a variety of global and microanalytical coding schemes (e.g.,…”