Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ): Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Psychometric Properties of the French Translation

By F. Jermann, Martial van der Linden, Mathijs D'Acremont, A. Zermatten. 2006

286 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7b6ece7f4010f0495e4a477a645c410185420729

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. M. Mikolajczak
2. P. Velotti
3. Daniela Villani
4. F. Biassoni
5. Jing Xiao
6. John R. Z. Abela
7. E. I. Bruin
8. Xi Tong

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. M. Mikolajczak
2. P. Velotti
3. Jing Xiao
4. John R. Z. Abela
5. E. I. Bruin
6. Xi Tong
7. Stefania Balzarotti
8. Xiongzhao Zhu

Citations in the corpus

• Measuring Individual Differences in Emotion Regulation: The Emotion Regulation Profile-Revised (ERP-R) (2011, background): “Internal reliability scores for the subscales range from .68 to .87 (Jermann et al., 2006).”
• Psychometric properties of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Chinese version (2008, methodology): “Such research should also aim to strengthen of internal consistencies of the Dutch (Garnefski et al., 2001), English (Martin & Dahlen, 2005), and French (Jermann et al., 2006) versions of the CERQ in order to be able to make more powerful crosscultural comparisons.”
• The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version (2012, methodology): “For this reason, it was adapted into different languages such as French (Jermann et al. 2006), Chinese (Zhu et al.”
• The Meaning of Mindfulness in Children and Adolescents: Further Validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) in Two Independent Samples from The Netherlands (2013, background): “We then hypothesized that this non-finding could also be related to the CERQ-factor of Acceptance in which items of passive resignation (non-adaptive strategy) and items of calm acceptance (adaptive strategy) are combined (Jermann et al. 2006).”
• Individual Differences in Cognitive Emotion Regulation: Implications for Subjective and Psychological Well-Being (2016, background): “95), these indices are comparable to those obtained for the original scale (Garnefski and Kraaij 2007), as well as for translations in other languages (Jermann et al. 2006).”