Relationships between the frequency of farmed Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., in wild salmon populations and fish farming activity in Norway, 1989–2004

By P. Fiske, R. A. Lund, Hansen Lp. 2006

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7b6cf407ab928b9fd18e7f6809e635225d496723

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

1. T. Dempster
2. P. Bjørn
3. B. Finstad
4. E. Thorstad
5. K. Boxaspen

In Global and Planetary Change

1. P. Bjørn
2. I. Uglem
3. Ian A. Fleming
4. P. McGinnity
5. E. Thorstad
6. T. Dempster

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Kevin Glover
2. K. Hindar
3. B. Finstad
4. T. Dempster
5. T. Svåsand
6. O. Diserud
7. Ian A. Fleming
8. P. McGinnity

Citations in the corpus

• Half a century of genetic interaction between farmed and wild Atlantic salmon: Status of knowledge and unanswered questions (2017, unknown): “…there is a lack of correlation between the incidence of farmed escapees in Norwegian rivers and the reported numbers of escapees, while in contrast, there is a correlation between the standing stock of fish in farms and incidence of farmed salmon escapees in Norwegian rivers (Fiske et al., 2006).”
• Risk assessment of the environmental impact of Norwegian Atlantic salmon farming (2015, background): “While the majority of escapees disappear post-escape (Hansen, 2006; Skilbrei, 2010a, b, 2013), each year, significant numbers of farmed salmon are nevertheless observed in rivers inhabited by wild populations (Fiske et al., 2006, Fiske, 2013).”
• Escapes of fishes from Norwegian sea-cage aquaculture: causes, consequences and prevention. (2010, background): “…of total numbers of escaped fish and the percentage of fish that escape rely on the officially reported statistics, which have been speculated to significantly underestimate the true level of escapes (Fiske et al. 2006, Torrissen 2007), because not all escape incidents are detected and/or reported.”
• Genetic and ecological effects of salmon farming on wild salmon: modelling from experimental results (2006, background): “Moreover, southwestern Norway and western Ireland are both important fish-farming areas, and escaped farmed salmon are common in both areas (Gausen and Moen, 1991; Clifford et al., 1998a, b; Fiske et al., 2001, 2006 ).”
• The major threats to Atlantic salmon in Norway (2017, unknown): “They also found a relationship between introgression levels and average proportion of escaped farmed salmon found in the rivers during monitoring (Fiske et al., 2006), although parts of the variation remain unexplained.”