Genetic and ecological effects of salmon farming on wild salmon: modelling from experimental results
By K. Hindar, Ian A. Fleming, P. McGinnity, O. Diserud. 2006
190 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Physiology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e6d11a137643b9449bc54c30e72606e8bcb15a9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
In Physiology
Citations in the corpus
- Risk assessment of the environmental impact of Norwegian Atlantic salmon farming (2015, background): “Overall, the study by Glover et al. (2013a) revealed less introgression of farmed Atlantic salmon in many Norwegian populations (Figure 2) than may be expected based upon the reported numbers of escapees in these populations, and estimations from introgression models (Hindar et al., 2006).”
- Escapes of fishes from Norwegian sea-cage aquaculture: causes, consequences and prevention. (2010, background): “…industry from expanding the number of sites it uses and the amount of fish it produces is immeasurable, but is likely to be significant, as the threats that escapes pose to wild populations are strong counterpoints in debates regarding industry expansion (Naylor et al. 2005, Hindar et al. 2006).”
- Genetic assignment identifies farm of origin for Atlantic salmon Salmo salar escapees in a Norwegian fjord (2008, background): “It has been argued that the numbers of farmed escapees need to be significantly reduced to protect wild salmon populations from potentially damaging genetic introgression from domesticated salmon (Hindar et al., 1991, 2006; McGinnity et al., 2003; Skaala et al., 2006).”
- Forensic identification of fish farm escapees: the Norwegian experience (2010, background): “…changes in wild Atlantic salmon populations, as a result of interbreeding between wild and farmed conspecifics, have been documented (Clifford et al. 1998a,b, Crozier 2000, Skaala et al. 2006), and it is likely that genetic impacts on wild populations are density dependent (Hindar et al. 2006).”
- Widespread genetic introgression of escaped farmed Atlantic salmon in wild salmon populations (2016, background): “Genetic introgression of escaped farmed salmon to wild salmon populations has been modelled (Hindar et al., 2006) based on relative fitness estimates (Fleming et al.”
- Half a century of genetic interaction between farmed and wild Atlantic salmon: Status of knowledge and unanswered questions (2017, unknown): “…between naturally produced smolts of farmed and wild salmon origin in the Imsa study, but later experiments based on smolt releases showed relative marine survival rates of farmed smolts to be 37% of wild smolts, with hybrid smolts not being significantly different to wild (Hindar et al., 2006).”