Clusters and Regional Development: Critical Reflections and Explorations. Edited by Bjørn Asheim, Philip Cooke and Ron Martin
By H. Bathelt. 2006
284 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7b6190edc744672ac5e53664df16544e22bbc653
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Michaela Trippl
- Arne Isaksen
- Pierre-Alexandre Balland
- Ron A. Boschma
- Luca Bettarelli
- Andrea Ascani
- L. Resmini
- Ron Martin
In Political Science and International Relations
- Michaela Trippl
- Arne Isaksen
- Pierre-Alexandre Balland
- Luca Bettarelli
- Andrea Ascani
- L. Resmini
- Ron Martin
- Franz Tödtling
In Strategy and Management
- Michaela Trippl
- Arne Isaksen
- Pierre-Alexandre Balland
- Luca Bettarelli
- Andrea Ascani
- L. Resmini
- Ron Martin
- Ron A. Boschma
Citations in the corpus
- Global networks, local specialisation and regional patterns of innovation (2020, background): “As such, linking knowledge sources across multiple spatial scales challenges the exclusive and dominant role of the local dimension as a selfsufficient institutional and economic construct able to generate innovation as an isolated system (Gertler and Levitte, 2005; Gertler and Wolfe, 2006).”
- Regional industrial path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis (2014, background): “Such conditions tend to prevail in old industrial areas (Grabher 1993, Hassink 2005, Trippl and Otto 2009) or in Italian industrial districts (see, for instance, Belussi and Sedita 2009).”
- Rebalancing the Spatial Economy: The Challenge for Regional Theory (2015, background): “…clusters can, under specific circumstances, form a valuable part of a regional or urban development strategy, in general the case for cluster policies remains theoretically ambiguous and empirically equivocal (DURANTON et al., 2010; DURANTON, 2011; ASHEIM et al., 2006; MARTIN and SUNLEY, 2011c).”