Applied Rasch Measurement: A Book of Exemplars

By R. Maclean, R. Watanabe, Robyn M Baker, Boediono, Y. Cheng, W. Duncan, J. Keeves, Mansheng Zhou, C. Power, J. Rajput and 4 more. 2005

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Rasch Rating Model and the Disordered Threshold Controversy (2012, methodology): “(Andrich, 2005, p. 323) he demonstrates nothing in the move from the model defined by (8) to (11) to the model defined by (12) to (14) that requires the ordering of the tau parameters, nor connects the ordering of the tau values to the ordering of the categories.”
Quantifying Local, Response Dependence Between Two Polytomous Items Using the Rasch Model (2012, background): “It is observed from Figure 1, and it can be proved, that the range in which the probability of the response x is the greatest of the response probabilities is bounded by the adjacent thresholds dx 1 and dx (Andrich, 2005).”
Conceptualising and Evaluating Teacher Quality: Substantive and Methodological Issues (2008, background): “…relevant examples, see: Embretson and Hershberger (1999); Goldstein (1997, 2003); Goldstein and Spiegelhalter (1996); Hill and Rowe (1996, 1998); Masters (2004b); Masters and Keeves (1999); Millmann (1997); Raudenbush and Bryk (1988); Raudenbush and Willms (1991, 1995); Rowe (2000, 2004b,…”
An Expanded Derivation of the Threshold Structure of the Polytomous Rasch Model That Dispels Any “Threshold Disorder Controversy” (2013, background): “Because of continuing misunderstandings in AWW, this motivation, which was introduced in Andrich (1978) and elaborated in Andrich (2005, 2010), is expanded further.”