GRIZZLY BEAR DEMOGRAPHICS IN AND AROUND BANFF NATIONAL PARK AND KANANASKIS COUNTRY, ALBERTA

By D. Garshelis, M. Gibeau, S. Herrero. 2005

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7b1fd1f058fbb5a850fa6afb777e1f9a7d8370ab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

Citations in the corpus

Hair cortisol concentration as a noninvasive measure of long-term stress in free-ranging grizzly bears (Ursus arctos): considerations with implications for other wildlife (2010, background): “Furthermore, some populations of grizzly bears within the province are among the slowest reproducing documented for this species (Garshelis et al. 2005).”
State and provincial estimates of American black bear numbers versus assessments of population trend (2006, background): “Techniques used to monitor grizzly bears (Boulanger et al. 2002, 2004; Garshelis et al. 2005), although expensive and limited to small study sites, could be incorporated into a carefully designed study of black bears aimed at testing the potential indices of trend that management agencies often use…”
Some mechanisms underlying variation in vital rates of grizzly bears on a multiple use landscape (2015, background): “…portion of their distribution in North America, >80% of grizzly bears older than yearlings are eventually killed by humans and most mortalities are near a road, camp, or permanent settlement (McLellan 1989b, 1999; Garshelis et al. 2005; Schwartz et al. 2006, 2010; Boulanger and Stenhouse 2014).”
A habitat-based framework for grizzly bear conservation in Alberta (2006, unknown): “…throughout much of North America in the past century (McLellan, 1998; Mattson and Merrill, 2002), largely due to vulnerability from late maturation, low density, low reproductive rates and a high trophic level (Russell et al., 1998; Purvis et al., 2000a,b; Woodruffe, 2000; Garshelis et al., 2005).”
Sexually selected infanticide in grizzly bears: the effects of hunting on cub survival (2005, background): “The survival of cubs in the hunted area was not lower than the 0.79 (P¼ 0.87, 1-tail) in the Banff and Kananaskis area (Garshelis et al. 2005) or the 0.77 (P¼ 0.76, 1-tail) in the South Fork of the Flathead (Mace and Waller 1998).”