Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines.

By P. Tricoci, Joseph M. Allen, J. Kramer, Robert M. Califf, Sidney C. Smith. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2009

911 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7afed07c7bd0b6fdc935a1feaaa4e526b824066a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. M. Smith
2. J. McGinnis
3. R. Saunders
4. Leigh Stuckhardt

In Statistics and Probability

1. M. Smith
2. Daniel Feaster
3. J. McGinnis
4. Min Lu
5. Saad Sadiq
6. Hemant Ishwaran
7. R. Saunders
8. Leigh Stuckhardt

Citations in the corpus

• Estimating Individual Treatment Effect in Observational Data Using Random Forest Methods (2017, methodology): “Rather than splitting tree nodes by maximizing the node variance, casual RF instead uses a splitting rule, which maximizes the treatment difference within a node (see Procedure 1 and Remark 1 in Wager and Athey 2017).”
• Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America (2013, background): “In some cases, 40 to 50 percent of the recommendations made in guidelines are based on expert opinion, case studies, or standards of care rather than on multiple clinical trials or meta-analyses (Chauhan et al., 2006; IOM, 2008, 2011b; Tricoci et al., 2009).”
• Regional Anesthesia in the Patient Receiving Antithrombotic or Thrombolytic Therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Fourth Edition) (2018, background): “A review of the evolution of practice guidelines and the strength/grade of recommendations noted that (1) the vast majority of guidelines are based on lower levels of evidence or expert opinion—level A recommendations (derived from randomized clinical trials) are rare; and (2) bias may exist due to ”
• Regional Anesthesia in the Patient Receiving Antithrombotic or Thrombolytic Therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Third Edition) (2009, background): “A recent review of the evolution of practice guidelines and the strength/grade of recommendations noted that (1) there are progressively more recommendations with each update; (2) most guidelines are based on lower levels of evidence or expert opinionVlevel A recommendations (derived from randomized”