Prediction of future cardiovascular outcomes by flow-mediated vasodilatation of brachial artery: a meta-analysis
By Yoichi Inaba, Jennifer A. Chen, Steven R. Bergmann. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2010
787 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ae8661e9c29e0cb13d680322725b78cae93c853
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Citations in the corpus
- Expert consensus and evidence-based recommendations for the assessment of flow-mediated dilation in humans. (2019, neutral): “This reduction was relevant both in high-and low-risk populations, 22,25 though appeared larger in patients with established CVD. 23,24 Except for one meta-analysis, 24 the overall estimated study quality did not significantly influence FMD predictive value.”
- Assessment of flow-mediated dilation in humans: a methodological and physiological guideline. (2011, result): “a conclusion supported by a recent meta-analysis (49).”
- Vascular Adaptation to Exercise in Humans: Role of Hemodynamic Stimuli. (2017, background): “Improvements in flowmediated dilation (FMD), a validated surrogate for CV health and disease risk (103, 145, 252, 287), can occur as a result of exercise training in the absence of changes in CV risk factors (109) reinforcing the notion that (196) exercise exerts some of its benefit by virtue of imp”
- The Impact of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Vascular Function: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2015, methodology): “A meta-analysis including 14 prospective studies encompassing 5547 participants reported a 13 % reduction in risk of cardiovascular events with a 1 % increase in FMD [41].”