The Impact of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Vascular Function: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
By Joyce S. Ramos, L. Dalleck, A. Tjønna, Kassia S. Beetham, J. Coombes. Sports Medicine, 2015
620 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Complementary and alternative medicine
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d736f42a083aec0af104254060a624b9f6d4595
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
In Complementary and alternative medicine
Citations in the corpus
- Effects of high-intensity interval training on cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies (2016, background): “22 A single meta-analysis 23 of six studies examined the effect of HIIT on traditional cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in individuals with cardiometabolic disorders and found HIIT and MICT to have similar effects on metabolic risk factors (body composition, BP, lipid pro fi le and glucose).”
- Vascular Adaptation to Exercise in Humans: Role of Hemodynamic Stimuli. (2017, background): “Recent work suggested that HIIT leads to superior improvements in vascular function compared to endurance training (250), although selection bias and inconsistencies in the FMD protocol may contribute to these findings.”
- Physiological adaptations to interval training and the role of exercise intensity (2017, background): “…(albeit sometimes sedentary or overweight) populations, the reader is directed elsewhere for recent reviews regarding the effect of interval training on health-related markers and disease risk (Gibala et al. 2012; Kessler et al. 2012; Weston et al. 2014a; Jelleyman et al. 2015; Ramos et al. 2015).”