A model of biogeochemical cycles of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus including symbiotic nitrogen fixation and phosphatase production
By Ying Ping Wang, B. Houlton, Christopher B. Field. 2007
256 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Plant Science, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7abc7f253d79444f06171df2e267f1f06678e6c6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Chemistry
In Plant Science
- Gordon Bonan
- L. Hedin
- C. Cleveland
- B. Houlton
- D. Lawrence
- William R. Wieder
- R. B. Jackson
- Stefano Manzoni
In Soil Science
- C. Cleveland
- B. Houlton
- L. Hedin
- N. Wurzburger
- Gordon Bonan
- William R. Wieder
- D. Lawrence
- A. Gallet‐Budynek
Citations in the corpus
- Nitrogen inputs accelerate phosphorus cycling rates across a wide variety of terrestrial ecosystems. (2012, unknown): “…N and P cycles, phosphatase activity is probably highly responsive to changes in both N and P, representing an important strategy by which organisms might be able to adjust to human alternations of global biogeochemical cycles (Gusewell & Freeman, 2005; Wang et al., 2007; Vitousek et al., 2010).”
- Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen-phosphorus interactions. (2010, background): “130 Conversely, additions of N can allow organisms to produce more extracellular phosphatase 131 enzymes that cleave ester-P bonds in soil organic matter (McGill and Cole 1981, Olander and 132 Vitousek 2000, Treseder and Vitousek 2001, Wang et al. 2007) – increasing local availability of 133 P.”
- Nitrogen and phosphorus interact to control tropical symbiotic N2 fixation: a test in Inga punctata (2013, background): “Both mechanisms could allow the plant to access additional phosphorus (Robson et al. 1981; Joner et al. 2000; Wang et al. 2007; Houlton et al. 2008; Turner 2008; Baribault et al. 2012).”
- Global resorption efficiencies and concentrations of carbon and nutrients in leaves of terrestrial plants (2012, background): “Because N is considered the most limiting nutrient for most terrestrial ecosystems, most ecosystem models consider N alone, with a few models also describing P dynamics explicitly (Parton et al. 1993, Wang et al. 2007).”
- Modeling plant–water interactions: an ecohydrological overview from the cell to the global scale (2016, background): “, Refs 297,298,349), and a minor fraction for phosphorous cycles.(363,372,373) It is worth noting that, although often unrealistic, the assumption of vegetation in equilibrium with the observed environmental conditions (climate, nutrient deposition, weathering rates) is commonly and unavoidably appl”
- Molybdenum limitation of asymbiotic nitrogen fixation in tropical forest soils (2009, unknown): “... 2,698:81:1:43 [117, 8] CNitrogen (LT) 44.82 (2:77) 1.66 (0:11) 497 (47) 55 (9) 2,425:76:1:39 [199, 8] CPhosphorus (LT) 35.20 (2:36) 1.35 (0:08) 907 (76) 118 (12) 1,116:36:1:44 [133, 16] CMicronutrient (LT) 38.51 (2:56) 1.32 (0:09) 469 (43) 215 (28) 2,242:65:1:283 [241, 8] Control (for Mo additio”
- Effects of model structural uncertainty on carbon cycle projections: biological nitrogen fixation as a case study (2015, methodology): “N biogeochemistry explicitly (Thornton et al 2007, Wang et al 2007, Sokolov et al 2008, Yang et al 2009, Gerber et al 2010, Zaehle et al 2010, Wania et al 2012).”
- Global assessment of limitation to symbiotic nitrogen fixation by phosphorus availability in terrestrial ecosystems using a meta‐analysis approach (2013, background): “At the same time, plants are N limited; otherwise, the plant fixation rate would have been low [Vitousek and Field, 1999; Voisin et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2007], at least for facultative N2 fixing species [Menge et al., 2009], which was not the case for most of the studies.”
- Carbon cost of plant nitrogen acquisition: A mechanistic, globally applicable model of plant nitrogen uptake, retranslocation, and fixation (2010, background): “... N has been completely depleted from the soil (e.g., BIOME‐BGC, CENTURY, DNDC, GFDL LM3V, HYBRID, SDGVM) [Friend et al., 1997; Gerber et al., 2010; Miehle et al., 2006; Schimel et al., 1996; Thornton and Rosenbloom, 2005; Woodward et al., 1998], whereas others include a more theoretically correct”