Value-driven attentional capture
By Brian A. Anderson, Patryk A. Laurent, Steven Yantis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011
1,055 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ab0ff4e4311f3361dfc038cbc498147061cd486
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Suzanne Hidi
- Kent C. Berridge
- Okihide Hikosaka
- Shinya Yamamoto
- Masaharu Yasuda
- Steven B. Most
- Wolfram Schultz
- Peter S. Dayan
Citations in the corpus
- Robust Representation of Stable Object Values in the Oculomotor Basal Ganglia (2012, background): “, 2009) and humans (Hickey et al., 2010; Kristjánsson et al., 2010; Anderson et al., 2011; Awh et al., 2012) even several days later (Della Libera and Chelazzi, 2009; Anderson et al.”
- Revisiting the Role of Rewards in Motivation and Learning: Implications of Neuroscientific Research (2016, background): “Finally, as mentioned in the section that dealt with the effects of rewards on attention, Anderson et al. (2011) reported that working memory and trait impulsivity affect how individuals’ attention is influenced by rewards.”
- Cognitive control and counterproductive oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli (2015, methodology): “A particularly clear demonstration of this is provided by the visual search task of Anderson et al. (2011a).”
- From prediction error to incentive salience: mesolimbic computation of reward motivation (2012, background): “The CS becomes hard not to look at (Wiers & Stacy, 2006; Hickey et al., 2010a; Piech et al., 2010; Anderson et al., 2011).”