Similarities or Differences in Identity Development? The Impact of Acculturation and Gender on Identity Process and Outcome

By Seth J. Schwartz, Marilyn J. Montgomery. 2002

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7aad59c4e6c214bc3cf9ca8441b52c460f97a3fe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Perceptions of Multiple Identities Among Black College Students (2009, background): “…identity and religious orientation (R. Kim, 2006; S. Kim, 2000; Park, 2004; Sciarra & Gushue, 2003), racial identity and personality (Silvestri & Richardson, 2001), racial identity and moral development (Moreland & Leach, 2001), and gender and identity processes (Schwartz & Montgomery, 2002).”
Employment, Sense of Coherence, and Identity Formation (2008, background): “Second, although recent research (e.g., Schwartz et al., 2005; Schwartz & Montgomery, 2002; but see Fadjukoff et al., 2007) has suggested more similarities than differences in identity processes or structure across gender, some mean differences in the identity dimensions have been reported.”
Gendered Perspectives in Psychology: Immigrant Origin Youth (2006, background): “Researchers have documented important gender differences in immigrant youth’s ethnic identity development (Waters, 1996; Lee, 2002; Schwartz and Montgomery, 2002; Qin-Hilliard, 2003).”
A Social-Cognitive Perspective on Identity Construction (2011, background): “The structure of the factors on which each style loaded was stable across the three ethnic groups (see also Schwartz & Montgomery, 2002 ).”
Identity and Agency in Emerging Adulthood (2005, methodology): “The factor structure of identity measures (identity style, identity exploration and commitment, and identity status) has been found to be largely consistent across immigrant generations and between genders (S. J. Schwartz & Montgomery, 2002).”
The Structure of Identity Consolidation: Multiple Correlated Constructs or One Superordinate Construct? (2007, methodology): “The EIPQ and the EOM-EIS-II have both been shown to be appropriate for multiethnic samples (S. J. Schwartz, Adamson, Ferrer-Wreder, Dillon, & Berman, 2006; S. J. Schwartz & Montgomery, 2002).”