The Place of Economic Values in Environmental Valuation

By R. Turner. 2001

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7aa6c1db6c4b9f0bc27799b920fda1eca4f3c0c5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Ian J. Bateman
2. G. Atkinson
3. Georgina M. Mace
4. K. Turner
5. Carlo Fezzi
6. J. Bergstrom
7. M. Hanemann
8. S. Farber

In Global and Planetary Change

1. K. Turner
2. G. Atkinson
3. Ian J. Bateman
4. Georgina M. Mace
5. Carlo Fezzi
6. S. Farber
7. J. Paavola
8. Philip Cooper

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. K. Turner
2. G. Atkinson
3. Georgina M. Mace
4. Ian J. Bateman
5. S. Farber
6. J. Paavola
7. Philip Cooper
8. Tobias Börger

Citations in the corpus

• Incorporating ecosystem services in marine planning: The role of valuation (2014, background): “Non-use values, motivated by bequest to future generations or pure existence of resources, are held independent of any current or future use (Turner 1999).”
• Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments (2011, background): “An obvious concern in adopting such an approach is that an over-concentration on final ecosystem services and their use and non-use to humans may place underlying ecological assets at risk (Gren et al., 1994; Turner, 1999) thereby risking over exploitation and system change or collapse.”
• On the relation between ecosystem services, intrinsic value, existence value and economic valuation (2013, background): “Although Krutilla did not relate existence value to moral motivation, Pascual et al. define existence value as the satisfaction originating in altruism towards biodiversity (Pascual et al., 2010; see also Turner, 1999: 21; Turner et al., 2003).”
• Contingent valuation, net marginal benefits, and the scale of riparian ecosystem restoration (2004, background): “Turner (1999) defines Total Economic Value (TEV) as the sum of all use and non-use values provided by an ecosystem.2 One approach, then, is to obtain values for each of the services provided by ecosystem protection or restoration.”
• Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions (2003, background): “While we believe that there is a strong case in favour of environmental economic valuation as a decision aid, we also recognise that there are limits to its use (Turner, 2000).”