Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers

By M. Jackson. 2003

1,226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7aa39193789328d14f1125834834d9ccd4f92a31

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government (2012, background): “System theory draws attention to the important distinction between systems which are open to their environment and those which are closed (Jackson, 2003).”
A Brief Review of Systems Theories and Their Managerial Applications (2010, background): “Systems thinking comes from the shift in attention from the part to the whole (Checkland, 1997; Weinberg, 2001; Jackson, 2003), considering the observed reality as an integrated and interacting unicuum of phenomena where the individual properties of the single parts become indistinct.”
The Relationship of ‘Systems Thinking’ to Action Research (2010, background): “The article places greater emphasis on systemic thinking consistent with its greater importance to contemporary action research (e.g., Bell 2008; Burns 2007; Coghlan and Brannick 2010; Jackson 2003; McIntyre 2008; Reason and Bradbury 2006).”
Errors in systems approaches (2012, methodology): “This is routinely accomplished through the use of one of a number of systems-based approaches (Jackson, 1991, 2000, 2003).”
Creating learning organizations: a systems perspective (2010, background): “This thinking system must be built as “creative holism” ( Jackson, 2003).”
A review and outlook for a 'Building Information Model' (BIM): A multi-standpoint framework for technological development (2011, unknown): “, organisational, technological and personal [63]).”
A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science (2010, methodology): “There has been a debate with Jackson as to whether CSH should be seen as one methodology among many others or as part of the process of structuring the problem prior to choosing methodologies (Jackson 2003a; Ulrich 2003).”