MODELING OF SITE OCCUPANCY DYNAMICS FOR NORTHERN SPOTTED OWLS, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE EFFECTS OF BARRED OWLS

By Gail S. Olson, R. G. Anthony, E. Forsman, S. H. Ackers, P. Loschl, J. Reid, Katie M. Dugger, E. Glenn, W. Ripple. 2005

179 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7aa092807c895f29eac5149735c0a5a111c64c21

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. James D. Nichols
2. L. Bailey
3. T. Mcdonald
4. E. Schauber
5. J. Hines
6. F. Hiraldo
7. C. Nielsen
8. E. Hellgren

Citations in the corpus

• The Invasion of Barred Owls and its Potential Effect on the Spotted Owl: a Conservation Conundrum (2007, methodology): “However, it is apparent that the barred owl appears to be having negative impacts on the spotted owl (Gutie ´ rrez et al. 2004; Anthony et al. 2006; Olson et al. 2004, 2005 ).”
• WHAT ARE THE ISSUES WITH PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA FOR WILDLIFE MANAGERS? (2005, unknown): “Experience and the analysis of empirical data sets (e.g., MacKenzie et al. 2003, 2005a ; Bailey et al. 2004; Olson et al. 2005) suggest that detection probability will likely vary between seasons (and possibly within seasons also).”
• Competitive interactions and resource partitioning between northern spotted owls and barred owls in western Oregon (2014, unknown): “As barred owls have rapidly increased their numbers throughout the range of the spotted owl, mounting evidence indicates that they are displacing, hybridizing with, and even killing spotted owls (Kelly et al. 2003, Olson et al. 2005, Anthony et al. 2006).”
• Intraguild predation in raptor assemblages: A review (2008, background): “…of the intraguild predator nearby, e.g. Kelly et al. 2003) or spatial (occupation rate of territories with and without a potential intraguild killer nearby, e.g. Olson et al. 2005, or change in occupancy rates along a continuum of distances to the potential killer, e.g. Sergio & Newton 2003).”
• Demographic response of northern spotted owls to barred owl removal (2016, background): “…relationships between barred owl detections and reduced site occupancy by spotted owls have been reported (Pearson and Livezey 2003, Gremel 2005, Olson et al. 2005, Kroll et al. 2010, Dugger et al. 2009) andOlson et al. (2004) reported that spotted owls had lower reproductive success on sites…”
• The effects of habitat, climate, and Barred Owls on long-term demography of Northern Spotted Owls (2016, background): “…that Barred Owls were having substantial negative effects on occupancy dynamics of Northern Spotted Owls, which was consistent with previous findings (Kelly et al. 2003, Olson et al. 2005, Anthony et al. 2006, Dugger et al. 2011, Forsman et al. 2011, Sovern et al. 2014, Yackulic et al. 2014).”
• Spatial and Temporal Structure of a Mesocarnivore Guild in Midwestern North America (2015, background): “…simultaneous surveys for multiple species can provide insight into spatial and temporal co-occurrence patterns and inform inferences about interspecific interactions and potential causes of changes in mesopredator populations (MacKenzie et al. 2004, Olson et al. 2005, O'Connell et al. 2006).”
• Modeling co-occurrence of northern spotted and barred owls: Accounting for detection probability differences (2009, methodology): “Previous work has suggested that spotted owl detection is reduced at territories where barred owls are known to be present (Olson et al., 2005; Crozier et al., 2006), but no study has explored whether, under the current survey protocol, barred owl detection may be influenced by the presence of spott”