Competitive interactions and resource partitioning between northern spotted owls and barred owls in western Oregon

By J. Wiens, Robert G. Anthony, E. Forsman. 2014

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bccbde36074cd24e1786d40454386d69ff181bff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. James D. Nichols
2. L. Bailey
3. T. Mcdonald
4. J. Hines
5. E. Forsman
6. J. Reid
7. Ralph J. Gutierrez
8. M. Z. Peery

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. L. Bailey
2. James D. Nichols
3. M. Z. Peery
4. Ralph J. Gutierrez
5. J. Keane
6. G. White
7. Sarah C. Sawyer
8. Viorel D Popescu

Citations in the corpus

• Detecting small changes in populations at landscape scales: a bioacoustic site-occupancy framework (2019, methodology): “Barred owls are competitively dominant to spotted owls and are believed to pose an existential threat to both subspecies (Gutiérrez et al., 2007; Wiens et al., 2014).”
• The effects of habitat, climate, and Barred Owls on long-term demography of Northern Spotted Owls (2016, background): “Model selection results, including the difference from the top model in Akaike’s Information Criterion corrected for small sample sizes (DAICc), number of parameters (K), model deviance (Deviance), and AICc weights (wi), for competitive models ( 2 AICc) from the analysis of occupancy dynamics of Nor”