Ecological and Evolutionary Consequences of Multispecies Plant-Animal Interactions

By S. Strauss, Rebecca E. Irwin. 2004

555 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a717aabcdd8291a921dccabd0b8743ec3a2606c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Diversity in a complex ecological network with two interaction types (2009, background): “Studies involving predation and competition (Chase et al. 2002, Arim and Marquet 2004) and mutualism and antagonistic interactions (Go ´mez 1996, Armbruster et al. 1997, Strauss 1997, Herrera 2000, Strauss and Irwin 2004 ) have shown that the combination of different interaction types is not random”
PART OF A SPECIAL ISSUE ON POLLINATOR-DRIVEN SPECIATION Pollinator shifts and the evolution of spur length in the moth-pollinated orchid Platanthera bifolia (2014, background): “…pollinators, but may also be influenced by selection exerted by antagonists and abiotic factors, and by random processes (Nuismer et al., 2000; Fenster et al., 2004; Strauss and Irwin, 2004; Herrera et al., 2006; Rausher 2008; Gómez et al., 2009; Anderson et al., 2010a; Armbruster et al., 2010).”
Species traits and abundances predict metrics of plant–pollinator network structure, but not pairwise interactions (2015, background): “…focused on identifying causal links between species ’ traits and the detailed structure of species interactions in order to predict the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of plants and their animal pollinators (Strauss and Irwin 2004, V á zquez et al. 2009a, Junker et al. 2010, 2013).”
The Fossil Record of Plant-Insect Dynamics (2013, background): “…tallies the average number of ecological associations or interactions of insects and mites found on a single host-plant species, then the number of interactions present today is a tenfold to a hundredfold multiple of the number of host plants (Strauss & Irwin 2004, Zheng & Dicke 2008).”
Defensive mutualism between plants and endophytic fungi? (2010, unknown): “Thus, we propose that future studies should (1) examine a “wider and wilder” range of plant-endophyte systems in long-term demographic field studies to better understand the general role of defensive mutualism in endophyte-plant interactions and (2) bridge the gap between the frameworks for understa”
Conditional outcomes in plant/herbivore interactions: neighbours matter (2006, background): “…of studies showing that plant /herbivore interactions strongly depend, in a predictable way, by the community context (Grubb 1992, Björkman and Accepted 19 September 2005 Copyright # OIKOS 2006 ISSN 0030-1299 OIKOS 113: 148 /156, 2006 148 OIKOS 113:1 (2006) Hambäck 2003, Strauss and Irwin 2004).”
On the role of enemies in divergence and diversification of prey: a review and synthesis (2005, background): “Seed predators and dispersers exert significant selection pressures on plants (Janzen 1971; Hulme 1998; Strauss and Irwin 2004; Tiffney 2004).”
Advancing environmentally explicit structured population models of plants (2016, background): “…shown to have strong effects on biotic interactions, and thus, the effects of species interactions depend on both the abiotic (e.g. Adler, Dalgleish & Ellner 2012; Maron, Baer & Angert 2014) and the biotic (e.g. Strauss & Irwin 2004; Chamberlain, Bronstein & Rudgers 2014) environmental context.”
Ecological and evolutionary consequences of spatial and temporal variation in pre-dispersal seed predation (2007, background): “Plants may interact with several animals, and correspondingly, characters may be shaped by different or even opposing selection pressures (Strauss and Irwin, 2004).”
The ‘night shift’: nocturnal pollen‐transport networks in a boreal pine forest (2011, background): “The study of these properties is relevant both for an understanding of the organisation of plant–animal mutualisms, and when considering the management and conservation of reproductive mutualisms (Strauss & Irwin, 2004; Vázquez et al., 2009).”