European policies in West Africa: who benefits from fisheries agreements?

By V. Kaczynski, D. Fluharty. 2002

297 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a4710efa1b29a434fed0c03dcb014d1e50e25b2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Daniel Pauly
2. U. R. Sumaila
3. Christophe Béné
4. Carl J Walters
5. E. Allison
6. Villy Christensen

Citations in the corpus

• A bottom-up re-estimation of global fisheries subsidies (2010, background): “Most of the EU agreements signed with West African states do not contain catch quotas for EU vessels and this usually results in resource overexploitation (Kaczynski and Fluharty 2002).”
• Unreported fishing, hungry people and political turmoil: the recipe for a food security crisis in Madagascar? (2012, background): “In fact, fishing access license fees paid by foreign countries are so attractive to the governments in poor countries [49,50] that it is likely that most of the large pelagic species will continue to be exploited almost exclusively by foreign countries.”
• Towards sustainability in world fisheries (2002, background): “, and by moving onto the then untapped resources of West Afric”
• Few data but many fish: marine small-scale fisheries catches for Mozambique and Tanzania (2010, background): “Tropical shrimp trawl fisheries also discard large fractions of their catch as unwanted bycatch (e.g. Kaczynski and Fluharty 2002), which often overlaps directly with those resources that small-scale fisheries rely on (and rarely discard).”
• "Trade matters in the fight against poverty": narratives, perceptions, and (lack of) evidence in the case of fish trade in Africa. (2010, background): “They further argue that fishing agreements signed between high income countries (importers) and developing nations (exporters) usually take advantage of the developing states without providing fair returns (Alder & Sumaila, 2004; Kaczynski & Fluharty, 2002; UNEP, 2002).”
• Recent developments in the tuna industry: stocks, fisheries, management, processing, trade and markets. (2010, background): “These preferential trade tariffs facilitate the reimportation of canned tuna processed by subsidiary companies of the European firms located in Africa, Latin America and Pacific Island countries, and from local companies that use tuna caught by European Union vessels (Mongruel, 2002; Kaczynski and F”
• Why study bycatch? An introduction to the Theme Section on fisheries bycatch (2008, background): “…industrialized and developing nations (Kelleher 2005), for distant water fleets operating within foreign exclusive economic zones (EEZs) and on the high seas (Kaczynski & Fluharty 2002, Xue 2006), and for intergovernmental fisheries management organizations (e.g. Fromentin 2003, Levesque 2008).”
• China's distant-water fisheries in the 21st century (2014, background): “eu, accessed July 2012) all texts related to fishing access agreements with other countries, which can be used for access analyses and examination (Kaczynski and Fluharty 2002; Kalaidjian 2010; Obaidullah and Osinga 2010; Le Manach et al. 2013).”
• Fisheries catch misreporting and its implications: The case of Senegal (2014, unknown): “…percentage of change derived from the combination of arrests per recorded infractions and arrests per authorized vessel (Johnstone, 1996; D.P.S.P., 2001; Kelleher, 2002; D.P.S.P., 2012) from 1950 onwards, as we assumed problematic activities to have begun in 1950 (see Belhabib et al., 2013a).”