Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Test of Gross Motor Development-2

By Ka Yee Allison Wong, Siu Yin Cheung. 2010

62 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a384bdd0d52567a826d2795f30b8d20725291f5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. N. Green
2. P. Hastie
3. Dwayne Patrick Sheehan
4. M. Rudisill
5. R. Keegan
6. Ellen H. Martin
7. William M. Roberts
8. Dana Perlman

In Sociology and Political Science

1. N. Green
2. P. Hastie
3. Dwayne Patrick Sheehan
4. M. Rudisill
5. R. Keegan
6. Ellen H. Martin
7. William M. Roberts
8. A. Casey

In Statistics and Probability

1. N. Green
2. P. Hastie
3. Dwayne Patrick Sheehan
4. M. Rudisill
5. R. Keegan
6. Ellen H. Martin
7. William M. Roberts

Citations in the corpus

• Motivational climate and fundamental motor skill performance in a naturalistic physical education setting (2009, methodology): “Ulrich (2000) reports the mean test-retest reliability coefficients as .88 for locomotor items and .93 for object control items, with the inter-rater reliability coefficients for both sub-scales at .98.”
• Charting Physical Literacy Journeys Within Physical Education Settings (2018, methodology): “Many assessments of motor skills are also used as proxies for physical literacy, including the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (Bruininks & Bruininks, 2005), the Test of Gross Motor Development-2 (Ulrich, 2000) and the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (Johnston & Watter, 2006”