Could new information influence attitudes to foods supplemented with edible insects

By F. Barsics, R. C. Megido, Yves Brostaux, C. Barsics, C. Blecker, E. Haubruge, F. Francis. 2017

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Insect Science, Sensory Systems, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a1753f48b9740742d1a009ceb26440078e22a21

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Insect Science

1. Marleen C. Onwezen

In Social Psychology

1. M. Reinders
2. Marleen C. Onwezen
3. Heesup Han

Citations in the corpus

• A Systematic Review on Consumer Acceptance of Alternative Proteins: Pulses, Algae, Insects, Plant-based Meat Alternatives, and Cultured Meat. (2020, background): “Barsics et al. (2017) Belgium 135 Experiment Insects Presence (versus absence) of label indicating insect ingredient in Jo urn al Pr e-p roo f Authors (year) Country Sample size Type of study Alternative protein Most important factor(s) influencing consumer acceptance bread, information session…”
• Opportunities and hurdles of edible insects for food and feed (2017, methodology): “Through the previous research they used e.g. Barsics et al (2017), Bukkens (1997), and EFSA (2015), among others, the three authors analyzed the opportunities and hurdles that arise from using insects as food or animal feed.”