Growth Versus Equity: The Continuum of Pro-Poor Tourism and Neoliberal Governance

By D. Schilcher. 2007

262 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Demography, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a1328bff2f1dbcbe5447cfa91cfa3da2cecb18b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

1. M. Russell
2. V. Truong
3. Emma Hughes
4. C. Michael Hall
5. Sandy Suardi
6. R. Mahadevan
7. R. Duffy
8. A. Spenceley

In Demography

1. C. Michael Hall
2. Emma Hughes
3. D. Meyer
4. A. Spenceley
5. R. Scheyvens
6. Sandy Suardi
7. R. Mahadevan
8. M. Russell

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Emma Hughes
2. R. Scheyvens
3. D. Meyer
4. A. Spenceley
5. C. Michael Hall
6. M. Russell
7. Maria Zapata
8. Sandy Suardi

Citations in the corpus

• A typology of governance and its implications for tourism policy analysis (2011, background): “Nevertheless, the failure to achieve desirable outcomes as a result of self-regulation, market failure and the limits of the market as a form of governance has increasingly been recognised, especially with respect to the equity of policy outcomes (Schilcher, 2007) and the achievement of more sustain”
• Tourism and poverty alleviation: perceptions and experiences of poor people in Sapa, Vietnam (2014, background): “This suggests that PPT is potentially a people-centred and holistic approach (Akyeampong, 2011; Schilcher, 2007).”
• Panel evidence on the impact of tourism growth on poverty, poverty gap and income inequality (2019, background): “More recently, attention has however focused on whether tourism growth is pro-poor, that is, whether tourism benefits poor people more than non-poor people (Ashley and Roe 2002, Schilcher 2007).”
• Tourism and poverty alleviation in Fiji: comparing the impacts of small- and large-scale tourism enterprises (2012, background): “…to see tourism as predominantly a private sector activity where market forces rule, today there is growing attention to the comprehensive role states must assume if tourism development is to meet the goals of sustainability and poverty reduction (Harrison, 2008; Schilcher, 2007; Sofield, 2003).”
• Pro-Poor Tourism: Do ‘Tourism Exchanges Benefit Primarily the Countries of the South’? (2007, background): “However, critics suggest that it is another form of neoliberalism that fails to address the structural reasons for the north–south divide, as well as internal divides within developing countries (e.g. Chok et al., 2007; Scheyvens, 2007; Schilcher, 2007).”
• Tourism and poverty reduction: theory and practice in less economically developed countries (2012, background): “…of academic studies related to the use of tourism as a tool for poverty reduction focus on the negative impacts of structural dependency (e.g. Schilcher, 2007; Sofield, 2003), but this was generally dismissed by the majority of interviewees in this study, who argued that the structure of the…”
• Can community-based tourism contribute to development and poverty alleviation? Lessons from Nicaragua (2011, background): “There are unequal opportunities for CBT, or generally for pro-poor tourism, to compete in the international tourism due to the limitations in access to assets such as capital and land, long international and vertically integrated chains, or market entry constraints (Schilcher, 2007).”
• Can tourism help to “end poverty in all its forms everywhere”? The challenge of tourism addressing SDG1 (2019, background): “It would be helpful to allow governments more agency to influence international frameworks and institutions, for example the World Trade Organisation, World Bank, and IMF (Schilcher, 2007).”
• Nature-based tourism and neoliberalism: concealing contradictions (2015, background): “There have been some recent critical studies by Fletcher (2011), Fletcher and Neves (2012), Davidov (2012), West and Carrier (2004), Schilcher (2007), Lacher and Nepal (2010) and Neves (2010) but they deserve further examination.”
• The impact of tourism on income inequality in developing economies: Does Kuznets curve hypothesis exist? (2016, unknown): “Moreover, Schilcher (2007) and Stabler et al. (2010) also claim that tourism is considered as one of the important industries dominated by TNCs, which have exploited the workers and resources of tourism areas/zones, repatriated of profits to their home count ry, commodified traditional cultures,…”