Carbon fiber reinforced plastics in aircraft construction
By Constantinos Soutis. 2005
826 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/79f616be16bdbe18992377bf82a64fb869493565
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Control and Systems Engineering
In Mechanics of Materials
Citations in the corpus
- A comparison of multi-scale 3D X-ray tomographic inspection techniques for assessing carbon fibre composite impact damage (2013, methodology): “Tomographic imaging using both laboratory sources and synchrotron radiation (SR) was performed to achieve a multi-scale damage assessment of carbon fibre composites subjected to impact damage, allowing various internal damage modes to be studied in three-dimensions.”
- Successes and challenges in non-destructive testing of aircraft composite structures (2020, background): “required, leading to improved structural weight, more aerodynamically efficient structural configurations and ultimately higher fuel efficiency.(3,5) The latter is crucial as in 2009, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) declared a cap on CO2 emissions, to provide carbon–neutral grow”
- Metal additive manufacturing in the commercial aviation industry: A review (2019, background): “Moreover, the increasing use of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) materials in aerospace is driving the interest in Titanium alloys [114, 115].”
- A Review of the Radio Frequency Non-destructive Testing for Carbon-fibre Composites (2016, background): “Carbon-fibre reinforced plastics composites (CFRP) have been widely used in aerospace, shipping and automotive structural applications, due to their superior stiffness and strength characteristics, fatigue and corrosion resistance [1].”
- Design and ageing of adhesives for structural adhesive bonding – A review (2015, background): “A weak fibre–matrix interface can lead to a low stiffness and strength but high resistance to fracture, whereas a strong interface produces high stiffness and strength but often a low resistance to fracture.(11) The failure behaviour depends not only on inherent heterogeneity and anisotropy, but als”