A comparison of multi-scale 3D X-ray tomographic inspection techniques for assessing carbon fibre composite impact damage

By D. Bull, Lukas Helfen, Ian Sinclair, S. Spearing, Tilo Baumbach. 2013

194 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Radiation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d40d8a9d7573d269b211b1bf3c2a30a53e9b9ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. P. J. Withers
2. Thomas Blumensath
3. Eric Maire
4. Marco F. Duarte
5. Yonina C. Eldar
6. Richard Baraniuk
7. Justin K. Romberg

In Radiation

1. P. J. Withers
2. Eric Maire
3. A. du Plessis

Citations in the corpus

• Successes and challenges in non-destructive testing of aircraft composite structures (2020, methodology): “11 Three dimensional segmentation revealing the damage morphology surrounding the impact region within the same specimen obtained by (a) l-CT with the dotted region indicating the region obtained using (b) SRCT.(246) Fig.”
• Quantitative X-ray tomography (2014, methodology): “Damage evolution ahead of a crack in composite laminates has been successfully observed using this technique in laminography experiments at similar resolutions as typically obtained by tomography.(198)”