Climate System Response to External Forcings and Climate Change Projections in CCSM4

290 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Effects of model structural uncertainty on carbon cycle projections: biological nitrogen fixation as a case study (2015, background): “…period (1850–2005), transient land cover change (Lawrence et al 2012, Oleson et al 2013), and an anomaly forcing protocol to replicate a single CCSM4 projection (Gent et al 2011, Meehl et al 2012) of climate change under the ‘business-as-usual’ representative concentration pathway 8.5 (RCP8.”
A decadal prediction case study: Late twentieth-century North Atlantic Ocean heat content (2012, methodology): “The reader is referred to Gent et al. (2011) and Meehl et al. (2012) for complete descriptions of the CCSM4 twentieth- and twenty-first-century control simulations and forcing details.”
Permafrost thaw and resulting soil moisture changes regulate projected high-latitude CO2 and CH4 emissions (2015, methodology): “The projection period forcing is calculated by applying monthly climate anomalies from a CCSM4 simulation (Meehl et al 2012) for the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP8.”