Site fidelity in habitats with contrasting levels of nest predation and brood parasitism
By K. Schmidt. 2001
151 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/79a06f8e23ba3dc83727ff85abcf0275913b348c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- A. Chalfoun
- Sarah Wanless
- M. Harris
- J. D. Ibáñez-Álamo
- W. Piper
- Corey J. A. Bradshaw
- R. Magrath
- J. Battin
Citations in the corpus
- Nest predation research: recent findings and future perspectives (2015, background): “This hypothesis was originally tested in relation to patch-scale fidelity (e.g. Bollinger and Gavin 1989; Hoover 2003), a scale at which it might be an evolutionary stable strategy (Schmidt 2001).”
- When Good Animals Love Bad Habitats: Ecological Traps and the Conservation of Animal Populations (2004, background): “Individuals of many migratory bird species are more likely to return to breeding sites where they have experienced success (i.e., where their nests were not depredated) than to those where they have been unsuccessful (Schmidt 2001).”
- Making habitat selection more “familiar”: a review (2011, background): “The third and greatest problem with the ideal models is their implicit assumption that animals settle on and switch territories regardless of past residency or the duration of that residency, that is, they assume “familiarity blindness” (or “site indifference”; sensu Schmidt 2001).”
- Competition for breeding sites and site‐dependent population regulation in a highly colonial seabird, the common guillemot Uria aalge (2004, background): “Animals may depart after they have themselves experienced a breeding failure (win-stay, lose-switch strategy; Switzer 1993; Schmidt 2001), and they may use the success of conspecifics to determine where to settle (the public information hypothesis, Boulinier et al .”
- Loyalty pays: potential life history consequences of fidelity to marine foraging regions by southern elephant seals (2004, methodology): “reproductive output, body condition) may be used as a surrogate measure (Schmidt 2001).”